<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lotus Connections: Be careful with backup of config files</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.urspringer.de/2009/09/18/lotus-connections-be-careful-with-backup-of-config-files/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.urspringer.de/2009/09/18/lotus-connections-be-careful-with-backup-of-config-files/</link>
	<description>by Michael Urspringer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:57:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Urspringer</title>
		<link>http://www.urspringer.de/2009/09/18/lotus-connections-be-careful-with-backup-of-config-files/comment-page-1/#comment-1255</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Urspringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urspringer.de/2009/09/18/lotus-connections-be-careful-with-backup-of-config-files/#comment-1255</guid>
		<description>Hi Robert,

thanks a lot for this clarification!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert,</p>
<p>thanks a lot for this clarification!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Melanson</title>
		<link>http://www.urspringer.de/2009/09/18/lotus-connections-be-careful-with-backup-of-config-files/comment-page-1/#comment-1254</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Melanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urspringer.de/2009/09/18/lotus-connections-be-careful-with-backup-of-config-files/#comment-1254</guid>
		<description>This note is from the IBM developer responsible for this area.

When each IBM® Lotus® Connections application starts up it reads/validates all of the Lotus Connections configuration XML files, which are stored with the IBM® WebSphere® Application Server configuration files.  An important point is that configuration in a file is NOT identified by the file name as one would expect - it is identified by the &#039;id=&#039; attribute of the config element (which is one of the standard ways to identify configuration data).  Thus, if a Lotus Connections configuration file is saved by renaming it from LotusConnections-config.xml to LotusConnections.SAVE.xml, for example, both files are XML files and contain the same set of configuration as far as Lotus Connections is concerned.

In earlier releases, Lotus Connections would read both files and use whichever version it read second.  Thus, configuration changes might be mysteriously ignored.  In release 2.5, the duplicate configuration is noticed and  the following error message is logged: CLFRO0130E: Error, multiple configurations found for configuration identifier . (In addition, the full filename for each file is given).  This, I would argue, is better/safer than using whichever configuration is read second.

Unfortunately, the message can get &quot;lost&quot; in the lengthy log as Connections continues to initialize.   This will most likely be dealt with in the next release/fix-pack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This note is from the IBM developer responsible for this area.</p>
<p>When each IBM® Lotus® Connections application starts up it reads/validates all of the Lotus Connections configuration XML files, which are stored with the IBM® WebSphere® Application Server configuration files.  An important point is that configuration in a file is NOT identified by the file name as one would expect &#8211; it is identified by the &#8216;id=&#8217; attribute of the config element (which is one of the standard ways to identify configuration data).  Thus, if a Lotus Connections configuration file is saved by renaming it from LotusConnections-config.xml to LotusConnections.SAVE.xml, for example, both files are XML files and contain the same set of configuration as far as Lotus Connections is concerned.</p>
<p>In earlier releases, Lotus Connections would read both files and use whichever version it read second.  Thus, configuration changes might be mysteriously ignored.  In release 2.5, the duplicate configuration is noticed and  the following error message is logged: CLFRO0130E: Error, multiple configurations found for configuration identifier . (In addition, the full filename for each file is given).  This, I would argue, is better/safer than using whichever configuration is read second.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the message can get &#8220;lost&#8221; in the lengthy log as Connections continues to initialize.   This will most likely be dealt with in the next release/fix-pack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Urspringer</title>
		<link>http://www.urspringer.de/2009/09/18/lotus-connections-be-careful-with-backup-of-config-files/comment-page-1/#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Urspringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urspringer.de/2009/09/18/lotus-connections-be-careful-with-backup-of-config-files/#comment-1249</guid>
		<description>So did I ... however I was 100% sure that it had something to do with the lines I changed in the config file so I did search for the wrong words in Google I guess...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So did I &#8230; however I was 100% sure that it had something to do with the lines I changed in the config file so I did search for the wrong words in Google I guess&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Handly Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.urspringer.de/2009/09/18/lotus-connections-be-careful-with-backup-of-config-files/comment-page-1/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>Handly Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urspringer.de/2009/09/18/lotus-connections-be-careful-with-backup-of-config-files/#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>I thought this was the primary reason we blogged - so Google could lead us back to our posts explaining how to do things we forgot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was the primary reason we blogged &#8211; so Google could lead us back to our posts explaining how to do things we forgot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

